Weiss Ratings -- A very incapable info provider, especially in the cryptocurrency industry. If people want to learn something about cryptocurrency, try to learn it from some reputable figures. Weiss Ratings has zero credibility in crypto space as we all know.
Review by Irene1 month ago
Bordering on a fraudulent enterprise because evidence of their claimed objectivity and thoroughness is non-existent. No references, no arguments to their analyses. Language designed to evoke emotional responses discouraging further research from the reader. Obviously biased for unknown reasons – deeply worrying.
Review by Tarushi1 month ago
I am very interested in cryptocurrencies, not because it's price but because of its actual technology. Now when I hear that Weiss is going to review Nano I like everybody else gets super excited... But after reading the review the feeling of disgust came even faster. Their review didn't once contain actual facts and the amount of false claims was outrageous
Review by Bublick2 months ago
I’ve seen more credible research and analysis at a preschool fingerpainting contest. The reviews are as worthless as beavers without teeth.
Review by Concordshops2 months ago
I do not think copying other authors' articles is worth anything..
Review by Rollos Carable2 months ago
Their research on certain projects was not objective but rather biased. Also no links or data to back up on their claims. Poorly executed ratings.
Review by Afrikah Camphaug2 months ago
Should not be in the business of rating cryptocurrencies. They don’t have even a basic understanding of how different protocols work and are extremely bias. As others have mentioned, they also plagiarize other peoples work. It’s about as bad as you can imagine.
Review by Yichun2 months ago
Copy and paste always.
Review by Mehak2 months ago
Ridiculous review about Nano
Review by Shochet Cofert2 months ago
They spread miss information and their reviews are usually based on copied text from older articles found on the internet.
Review by TShewmake2 months ago
Weiss rating has plagiarized a blog post from steemit that was posted a month ago, about NANO and then called it a review???
Review by Drrobi Palamakumburs2 months ago
The ratings, as one might call them, are based on subjective impressions of individuals without the ability to comprehend the evaluated mentally. I can strongly advise against any contact with these individuals.
Review by Bryzee2 months ago
Reviews based on Ctrl c + Ctrl v! Just bad reviews and reviewers!
Review by Jonra Slug2 months ago
you need learn more about NANO
Review by Heavenscentseniorservices DeFatta3 months ago
wasteratings copy pasting articles , cannot be trusted of their source, lack of knowledge and completely bias to create fud
Review by Pikulz3 months ago
SHAME!!! SHAME!!! SHAME!!!
Review by Packyabags3 months ago
Reviews are often shallow, totally off the mark, ignorant, and absolutely clueless. Will imperil those who get fooled by their work. They rate highly the most controversial and scammiest of coins. On the other hand, they'll probably give your crypto asset a good review if you compensate them well.
In all the years we've seen their work, they've been pretty much useless and wrong for just about everything else.
Review by Rithea3 months ago
The rating of the Nano token was complete bull crap.
You could google search, word-for-word the article that Weiss ratings "published" and you would find matching articles on different websites before the article went live on the weisscrypto website.
When weisscrypto presented "proof" that they published the article on their website before other websites (trybe, medium, etc.), the proof came in the form of a PDF file. And the meta data showed that the PDF was published on July 27th 2019. Previously published articles on different websites were July 12th and even June 20th of 2019.
In the end their proof neither proved nor disproved their plagiarism of another article.
Review by MickeyRae3 months ago
A sell out company trying to squeeze money from crypto industry. They have no technical understanding of anything and give out high ratings to scam coins who have paid them.
Review by Howi Maccombie3 months ago
These rankings were clearly uninformed and underwhelming. Zero credibility with the crypto community
Review by Saintenoy3 months ago
Their cryptocurrency reviews are sub par. It appears they don’t understand the technology or take the time necessary to fully understand it.
For example, with nano currency, they posted an article today that was completely flawed. In fact, it was so flawed that it’s evident a review was completed with minimal to no research involved.
Nano is one of the most secure cryptocurrency networks to date, instant, scalable and decentralized. The article written by Weiss says it is neither decentralized (not true) and double spends are possible which would make the network not secure (outrageously completely not true).
I won’t sit here and pick apart every piece of information, but seriously I would have no problem with actual pros and cons being listed. This article is just complete rubbish.
And it’s not just with nano, it seems like there are many coins out there they review with no research to push out rubbish articles just to fluff their monetized content.
Weiss ratings, you should be ashamed.
Review by Guffert Lundstrum3 months ago
Their article about $nano review is a copy paste of an existing article.
Very bad signal for a start.
They are simply not serious as they didn't make their own research. Indeed, the article is erronous for most of the related topics.
Review by ZorroKitty Uhgai4 months ago
Plagiarizing false information on a project (NANO). Y'all should be ashamed of yourselves.
Review by Leppis4 months ago
I can’t take a this review system seriously. It is like the yelp for cryptocurrency. Embarrassing.
Review by Bigdady4 months ago
I was waiting for concrete reviews, but all I got was biased opinions formed in 3 days of research.
EDIT: Even worse, it was pure plagiarism of a month old article!