Please write a review with more than 10 characters.
Review by Kapook3 months ago
Very good editing , effective, understandable and fast
Review by Letisja Derrow3 months ago
Clinical significance of slightly reduced von Willebrand factor activity (30–50 IU/dL)
Ksenia Bykowska, Bernadeta Ceglarek
Review by Crystalin3 months ago
Super impressed with the turn around time and the quality of the feedback. I've already booked my next website proofreading project.
Review by Makiba3 months ago
Very fast service. The proofread was very good, I'm very happy with the text now. I recommend the person that have edited my texts; he/she have made two (or three) different edits and I'm totally happy.
Review by ParagVapiwala3 months ago
Yet another 5-star experience, thank you!
Review by AlisonGrace4 months ago
I'm extremely impressed by your services. If you need a good editing company, Scribendi is your best bet.
Review by Quikstar4 months ago
It's quick and the editor is sincere and helpful.
Review by Chrisandio4 months ago
Thank you very much
Review by Kilduff5 months ago
Extremely bad service.
Absolutely disappointed. My order number is 624486.
The quaility of editing is very poor, also the customer service. I am not satisfied with the level of change, the editor doesn’t know the requirements of dissertation, so she/he doesn’t know how to correct the tense and her/his edited version has even made some meaning wrong and more vague.
If you provide the service of dissertation, you should know the basic requirements of the tense: abstract, main body and conclusion may have some differences. But, your editor commented that she/he is not sure, so why I ask help from you if you don’t know? The edited version has made all the tense uniform and made more mistakes, I must re-correct the mistakes of tense you made. It’s a waste of both time and money. What’s more, the level of writing has never been improved at all. The editing just checked tiny grammar but never enhanced the total level.
And I requested for re-editing or full refund twice when I just received the draft, but the terrible customer service firstly replied that let me wait, couple of hours later replied that it meets their Quality and totally ignored the issues I put forward.
Never,never use SCRIBENDI, who provides the service of dissertation check but they even don’t know the basic requirements of dissertation such as the tense.
Review by Ledbury5 months ago
Fast and good editing work
Review by Nashat Jekova5 months ago
It was really well done.
Review by Porshy5 months ago
Nearly all change proposals improved my text
Review by Aurely5 months ago
Review by Rmb Granshoab5 months ago
I found your service very professional and affordable.
Review by Bodyism Figgis5 months ago
well proofread. I satisfied.
Review by Alekseyi5 months ago
I am not a native English, scribendi help me write my paper more understandable than before. The structure and grammar corrected as well. Thank you a lot.
Review by Customerdeby Alay6 months ago
I've been using Scribendi since long, the editor who worked on my text last time was one of the best I ever experienced (EM1680); he/she has presented all amendments and corrections always as kind suggestions, all were very clear and perfecltly right, and I was very satisfied.
Review by Prasandan Hedijanto6 months ago
I needed to have a conference paper proofread, and formatted according to the APA style so I paid for their academic proofreading service. However, when I got the edited paper back, the editor did Not format my paper according to the APA style. Instead, in most places, the editor just left me comments about how to format the paper and directed me to a sample APA paper. This totally defeats the purpose. If I still have to format the paper myself by looking at a sample paper afterwards, I could have just found a free sample online myself in the first place. I just don't understand why he or she couldn't just format my paper correctly and insert a place holder for any additional information that I still need to fill out myself so that I could quickly fix any minor issues and could have submitted my paper by now. For instance, if you ask me to separate the title and the abstract into two different pages, then why don't you just insert a page break between my title and abstract and insert a few placeholders if there is any additional information that I still need to fill out on the title page (e.g. "Insert your running head here, all caps, 50 character max including space")? Instead, I now will have to spend the rest of the afternoon formatting my paper. I am lucky that I still have the rest of the day to format my paper. But if you order a rush order and have to submit your paper shortly after it comes back, I guarantee you, you will miss the submission deadline due to a hundred of issues left in the edited paper for you to fix by yourself. Moreover, the editor changed the meaning of a lot of my sentences. This is totally not acceptable and it shows that the editor does not understand even some very basic math concepts. There are many other things that the the editor changed that make me doubt the person's general reading comprehension ability. For instance, "parallel efforts" means something that happened concurrently during our pilot study. I did NOT say it was part of our pilot study, so don't play experts and change my original meaning and force something into my study. Also, "another terminal illness" means a terminal illness different from the one that I just talked about. "Another" means "another" in this context, Don't chance it to "a". Additionally, while the APA style guide encourages the use of an active voice, the editor changed a lot of my sentences to a passive voice. I made a complaint to the customer service, and they offered to redo the proofreading of the original document. But then they had the original editor redo it so it is NOT much improved. The editor just basically deleted a lot of his/her sentences and then typed in a lot of my original sentences instead of actually redoing the proofreading or at least using the "reject insertion/reject deletion" function. The tracked change version is now a totally unreadable mess. Is it really this hard to just fix my typos and grammatical errors and format my paper correctly and show me where these places are? Just stay away from this company. Totally a waste of time and money.
Review by Fvanleur6 months ago
Excellent work! Thank You! I would happily use your services again.
Review by Hadeily Cadmore6 months ago
Tried this service after a horrible experience with a different editing service and it exceeded my expectations.
Review by CustomerMona Apostolides6 months ago
I am really happy as the turnover time was very fast, and the proofreading was good. It came in two versions, one version for me to see all the changes so that I can learn from it, it was great!
Review by Tarck7 months ago
Extreemly satisfied with all aspects of the service. Thank you!
Review by Daksha7 months ago
I really like the comments from your editor. It’s very useful for me to think how to write it in a better way. Thank you.
And it’s great the editor completed my order in 24hrs.